|
What I liked:
Easy to made,
less one hour to build it
What I disliked:
Heavy for
the OTA. Need to balance the scope each time the dew shield
is put and remove. Lose the aligment if the OTA move during
this operation. Plus, unefficient if the telescope pointed
around the zenith.
|
|
|
The
dew shield was the first idea that came to
my mind. It was logic, simple and most probably efficient.
After different search on Internet I decided to build
my own since there is no need to get specific knowledge
and material. After finding a smooth light material
that can support humidity (of course) I took several
measures on my scope and rapidly designed and built
it.
After several observing sessions
I dare say I was quite disappointed. Indeed,
this kind of solution did better protect my corrector
plate but that depends on the duration and the
orientation of the telescope the dew always comes.
In my opinion there are several problems with this
part. First of all, due to the weight of the
dew heater you must balance your telescope
to avoid damaging the motor drives and to save your
accurate tracking. Secondly, during an observing session
it's necessary to put and remove the dew heater
many times to set a Hartman mask on the front of the
telescope so as to focus it. This manipulation can
rapidly become tricky in so far as you can lose
your alignment in case the OTA should move during
the operation. Moreover, the control software could
lose its north as well. As mentioned before, according
to me the main problem for this part is that it's
totally unefficient if your telescope works
around the zenith. This remains a huge problem
because the better way to do visual and CCD sessions
is to observe deep sky object near the zenith. At
that time I understood that the best way to resolve
my problems would be the electronic.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
move your mouse
on the pictures
|
|